Lumirix® Efficacy:
Phase 3 Clinical Evidence

This image is for illustrative purposes only.

Two Phase 3, double-blind, vehicle-controlled trials Topical Ruxolitinib Evaluation in Vitiligo Study 1 [TRuE-V1] and 2 [TRuE-V2] examined the efficacy of ruxolitinib cream for repigmentation of skin lesions in adolescents and adults with nonsegmental vitiligo.

Two phase 3, double-blind, vehicle-controlled trials in North America and Europe that involved patients 12 years of age or older who had nonsegmental vitiligo with depigmentation covering 10% or less of total body-surface area.² Patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to apply 1.5% ruxolitinib cream or vehicle control twice daily for 24 weeks to all vitiligo areas on the face and body, after which all patients could apply 1.5% ruxolitinib cream through week 52.²

TRuE-V1 and TRuE-V2 Study Design¹⁰

*1 randomized patient who did not apply ≥1dose of Ruxolitinib cream was excluded from safety analyses.
13 patients from 1 study site were excluded from efficacy analyses for compliance issues.

Primary Endpoint

% of patients achieving an F-VASI75 response at week 24.²

Key Secondary Endpoints (all at week 24)²

% of patients achieving F-VASI50 and F-VASI90 responses.

% of patients achieving a T-VASI50 response.

% of patients achieving a VNS response of 4 (‘a lot less noticeable’) or 5 (‘no longer noticeable’).

% change from baseline in affected F-BSA.

Other Secondary Endpoints²

Safety and tolerability.

% change from baseline in F-VASI, T-VASI, affected F-BSA and T-BSA during the treatment period.

% of patients having F-VASI improvements or T-VASI improvements.

The face includes the area on the forehead to the original hairline, on the cheek to the jawline vertically and laterally from the corner of the mouth to the tragus. It includes the surface area of the nose but not that of the lips, scalp, eyelids, ears, or neck.² VNS was assessed for facial lesions only.²

ƗDetermination of disease stability was based on the investigator’s judgment.
ǂ Patients could have used multiple previous lines of therapy.​

24- & 52-week data

Half the patients who applied Ruxolitinib reached F-VASI75 at week 52.¹⁰

Efficacy of Ruxolitinib cream in Achieving the Primary Endpoint of F‑VASI75 Response.

*** P<0.001 for response rate difference for ruxolitinib cream vs vehicle.​

Over 70% of patients on ruxolitinib cream achieved colour-matching§ response.¹⁰

§Color-matching response was defined as achieving a rating of good, very good, or excellent.

T-VASI50 responses were observed in all body areas, including hands and feet11

Adapted from ref. 11

2-year data (TRuE-V LTE)

The TRuE-V Long Term Extension (LTE) study follows patients
who completed the TRuE‑V1 and TRuE‑V2 phase 3 trials.12,13

The goals were to understand:

Long‑term efficacy of ruxolitinib cream

Durability of repigmentation

Relapse rates after stopping treatment

Safety over long‑term continuous use

Continued long‑term responses in patients with limited or no early repigmentation at Week 24

Cohort Enrollment

At Week 52 of the parent studies, patients were assigned to one of two cohorts based on their facial response:

Cohort A: ≥F‑VASI90 (N=116)

These were the high responders who achieved ≥90% facial repigmentation.

This group allowed researchers to evaluate whether repigmentation can be maintained without continuous therapy.

Primary end point : Time to relapse (defined as a <F-VASI75 response) after treatment discontinuation among patients randomised to vehicle.

Secondary end point : Time to maintain a ≥F-VASI90 response after treatment discontinuation.

Cohort B: <F‑VASI90 (N=342)

These were patients who still had room for improvement.

They continued open‑label ruxolitinib cream to measure additional gains in repigmentation over time.

End point : Shifts and maintenance of facial and total body repigmentation

TRuE-V LTE was a rollover randomized withdrawal (double-blind) and treatment-extension (open-label) study enrolling patients who completed TRuE-V1/TRuE-V2.12

a Cohort enrollment was based on clinical response at week 52 of parent studies.
b Concomitant vitiligo treatments, such as phototherapy, were not permitted during the TRuE-V LTE study.
cPatients randomised to vehicle who relapsed (<F-VASI75) could apply Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID rescue treatment for the remainder of the LTE period.
Two patients (n=1 from each arm) were excluded from the analysis due to protocol nonadherence at the site. Three patients were incorrectly assigned to Cohort A (treatment-continuation arm, n=2; treatment-withdrawal arm, n=1) and included in the analyses.

Continuous application of Ruxolitinib cream maintained F-VASI75 and F-VASI90 responses through Week 10412

Continued application of ruxolitinib cream; n=57; treatment discontinuation (vehicle); n=57

At week 104, over 63% of patients who continued application of Ruxolitinib cream maintained F-VASI75, and over 56% maintained
F-VASI90 respectively.

In patients in Cohort B, continued application of Ruxolitinib cream
generally led to improved F-VASI scores at week 10413

Data at weeks 80 and 104 are from cohort B.
a Patients with worsening or no improvement in F-VASI (ie, ≤0%) at week 24 and nonmissing F-VASI values at weeks 52, 80, or 104.
b Patients with >0%–<25% improvement in F-VASI at week 24 and nonmissing F-VASI values at weeks 52, 80, or 104.

At week 104, more than 8 out of 10 participants from Cohort B gained
F-VASI improvements.

F-BSA: facial body surface area; NB-UVB: narrow-band ultraviolet-B; PUVA: psoralen ultraviolet-A; T-BSA: total body surface area.​

References

  1. Rosmarin D, Passeron T, Pandya AG, Grimes P, Harris JE, Desai SR, Lebwohl M, Ruer-Mulard M, Seneschal J, Wolkerstorfer A, Kornacki D. Two phase 3, randomized, controlled trials of Ruxolitinib cream for vitiligo. New England Journal of Medicine. 2022 Oct 20;387(16):1445-55.
  1. Rosmarin D, Passeron T, Pandya AG, Grimes P, Harris JE, Desai SR, Lebwohl M, Ruer-Mulard M, Seneschal J, Wolkerstorfer A, Kornacki D. Two phase 3, randomized, controlled trials of ruxolitinib cream for vitiligo. New England Journal of Medicine. 2022 Oct 20;387(16):1445-55. Supplementary material.
  2. Hamzavi I, et al. ‘Efficacy of Ruxolitinib Cream in Vitiligo by Patient Characteristics and Affected Body Areas: Descriptive Subgroup Analyses from a Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind Trial’. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2022;86:1398–401.
  3. Rosmarin D, et al. Presented at the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV) Congress; September 25–28 2024; Amsterdam, Netherlands.​
  4. Wolkerstorfer A, et al. Presented at European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology Annual Meeting; October 11–14, 2023; Berlin, Germany; late-breaker presentation.